The problem
Articles, tutorials and documentation cite sources that move, vanish or are rewritten. The article still reads well, but the evidence behind it is gone.
What it checks
- Outbound links extracted from your article, or sources you add by hand
- Availability, redirects and final status of each source
- Title and main-text fingerprint, so small edits (dates, navigation) are ignored and a replaced main text is not
What you get
A list of content marked "needs review" with the reason, a review workflow (acknowledge, update the source, dismiss) and alerts.
Who it is for
Publishers, content teams, technical writers, knowledge bases and educators.
What it does not do
- It does not check whether a cited claim is still true. It detects changes to sources, not the truth of statements.